Skip to content

Add solution for Project Euler problem 67 #5519

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 28, 2021
Merged

Add solution for Project Euler problem 67 #5519

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 28, 2021

Conversation

naveennamani
Copy link
Contributor

A faster and memory efficient solution based on the template of sol1.py.
Modified the solution to be more memory efficient while reading and generating the array
and during the solution finding.
No conditions and straightforward logic.

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

A faster and memory efficient solution based on the template of sol1.py.
Modified the solution to be more memory efficient while reading and generating the array
and during the solution finding.
No conditions and straightforward logic.
@ghost ghost added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html labels Oct 22, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

@ghost ghost removed the require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html label Oct 22, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@franciscoperez2021 franciscoperez2021 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good to me as I have tested locally comparing solutions with sol1.py as well as I have tested with different triangles.txt files

@naveennamani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are @Kush1101 @dhruvmanila only the reviewers here? Can't I add any other reviewers? Or no other reviewers gonna look at this because they've not assigned?

@naveennamani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cclauss @franciscoperez2021 can you please look this? Thanks

Preferring comprehensions over map

Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
@naveennamani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are @Kush1101 @dhruvmanila only the reviewers here? Can't I add any other reviewers? Or no other reviewers gonna look at this because they've not assigned?

Can I please get any other reviewers @cclauss @franciscoperez2021 ? Thanks

@ghost ghost added awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR and removed awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 28, 2021
Self explanatory variable names
@ghost ghost added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed and removed awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR labels Oct 28, 2021
@naveennamani naveennamani requested a review from cclauss October 28, 2021 15:39
@ghost ghost added awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR and removed awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 28, 2021
@ghost ghost added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed and removed awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR labels Oct 28, 2021
@naveennamani
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's now good to go?

@ghost ghost removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 28, 2021
@cclauss cclauss requested a review from poyea October 28, 2021 17:16
Copy link
Member

@poyea poyea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your pull request!🤩

@poyea poyea changed the title New solution for Euler problem 67 Add solution for Project Euler problem 67 Oct 28, 2021
@cclauss cclauss merged commit 11a15cc into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants